The Gutenberg Museum in Mainz – “The World Museum of Printing” – is truly an unmissable destination for any lover of the history of print. I’ve spent untold hours there in the exhibition rooms and library, learning not only about Gutenberg and his world but the entire history of the technology of writing. So it was with some surprise that I recently read that in this celebratory year of Gutenberg 2018—five hundred fifty years after his death—the museum dedicated to the great inventor is in the midst of a raging controversy.

A proposal to renovate the aging museum and turn it into a international showpiece has met stiff resistance from many citizens of Mainz, who will decide in a referendum in April whether the project should go forward.

At the center of the controversy is a new “Bible Tower” (Bibelturm) made of a lace of giant letters that would serve as entryway to the refurbished museum, adding new gallery space above and underground. The design won an architectural competition and reminds me a bit of a cross between the new tower at Tate Modern in London and the Pyramid at the Louvre in Paris—which similarly functions as an architectural doorway to the museum complex.

You can see the renderings and photos of the proposed building here. The citizens group opposing the move fears it will dwarf the historic medieval plaza of the Liebfrauenplatz, and worry about how it will be financed. Without wishing to enter the debate, I would say however that it is high time the museum got a facelift—not only architecturally but in terms of presenting its treasures. The displays are dated and old-fashioned and do not do justice to the remarkable collection of incunabula and printing technology that the museum has to share with the world.

Anyone who appreciates the tremendous history of the book and early printing has Mainz’s Gutenberg Museum on his or her bucket list. Here’s hoping that the town of Gutenberg’s birth finds a way to bring his epochal achievement into the modern age.

Article on the controversy in German here:

I just returned from Kassel, Germany, where the documenta contemporary art exhibition takes place every five years. What struck me after two days of wandering around was how many books there are in the art being made now. Real books. Physical books. Ledgers and notebooks and written documentation of every kind.

We’re all fairly done with the idea that the electronic book was going to replace the physical object that has been around for two thousand years. Still it was interesting to see the degree to which artists rely on this modest vessel. At this very political documenta, “the book” appears in many guises: as reminder of atrocities past, the persistence of ideologies, shorthand for the life of the mind, a locus for self-expression. And so on. The huge centerpiece of the show is “The Parthenon of Books” by the Argentinian Marta Minujin, in which thousands of books previously banned or restricted by governments aound the world are encased in plastic to create a replica of the Acropolis’s main building. So far, so obvious. A more interesting exhibit, to me, is the vast “Rose Valland Institute” by the German artist Maria Eichhorn (tall bookcase photo) which is a huge research project attempting to inventory all of the personal property, books and libraries included, expropriated from Germany’s Jews by the Nazis. (It’s named for a German art historian who secretly listed expropriated property during the Nazi occupation of Paris www.rosevallandinstitut.org).

One mixed media exhibit by Daniel Garcia Andujar featured all kinds of references to the horror of war, including stereoscopic images of war damage (pictured), the artist lounging reading a—book (pictured) and a copy of Bertold Brecht’s Kriegsfibel (War Bible) along with a puzzle made from Picasso’s Guernica, among others. Another horrifying exemplar was Louis XIV’s 1742 guide defining the conditions of enslaving black people in French imperial colonies (pictured). It is considered “the most monstrous legal document of modern times.”

And then, in a break from the dreadful past, scattered throughout the show are individual volumes as objects, similar to those one might see in a contemporary fine book show. One book featured delicately stitched pages; a group of others were fashioned from bread dough. There was even a “wall” in the “Neue Galerie” which was made on site from books and mortar at the fourth documenta in 1977: the “Door to the Library” by Huburtus Gojowczyk (pictured).

While this documenta (the 14^th) explicitly addresses questions of migration, refugee flows, economic justice and other pressing political issues, these exhibits to me suggested more. They underscored how verbal is much of the art being made today. As these examples show, many artists are interested in documenting processes—of exploitation, democratic resistance and so on. Conveying such complex human exchanges, it seems, requires words as much as images. Vive la parole, one might say: Long live the word.

Out of the 49 complete or partial copies of the Gutenberg Bible known to humanity, only one is the property of a high school library. Granted, Eton College is not just any high school. It was founded by King Henry VI in 1440, a convenient punt ride across the Thames from Windsor Castle. This also explains how a secondary school — rather than a university or private, state or national library–came to own one of the first major printed books in the West. When you are one of Britain’s leading schools for the ruling elite, chances are you will have a number of rather important, rich and, luckily for us, bibliophilic alumni.

As the story goes, in the early 1830s, an Old Etonian named John Fuller, who also happened to be a Member of Parliament from Sussex, was thinking of donating something to his old school.  “Do you have a Gutenberg Bible?” he is said to have inquired. Answered in the negative, he promptly bequeathed Eton the copy he had purchased from a British bookseller named Payne, who in turn purchased it at the sale of the Countess d’Yve in Brussels in 1819.

This paper (not vellum) copy of Gutenberg, Fust and Schöffer’s masterpiece was originally purchased by the Carthusian monastery in Erfurt, which as readers of my novel will know, was the seat of the great university at which both Gutenberg and Schöffer studied. It likely came onto the European market after the monasteries were seized by Napoleon. I was lucky enough to see it last week at Eton’s gorgeous 18th century library, which contains the Eton College Collections of rare books and manuscripts. The collection boasts about 200 books printed before 1500 (incunabula), including a whole bookcase full of Aldines (the classics printed in Venice by Aldus Manutius, pictured below). Stephanie Coane, assistant librarian for early books, had both volumes of the Bible waiting for my inspection. It was remarkable, I said, to be looking at a book that was made at virtually the same time that the school was founded. (In 1440, the inventor Gutenberg was hard at work on getting moveable type to work at his orchard workshop outside Strasbourg. All 180 or so copies were produced and sold by 1454, scholars think.)

This copy also boasts the only known original binding with original binders’ mark, by one Johannes Fogel of Erfurt; though the spine is cracking, it has held up well; it also has tipped-in tabs the monks presumably stuck on to indicate the starts of different Biblical books. The illuminations feature curling leaves and vines supporting different birds. Though I couldn’t photograph it for you, the paintings resemble the copy in the British Library which my British publisher reproduced on its edition of “Gutenberg’s Apprentice” (pictured). Ms Coane knows her birds: on the opening of Genesis and Jerome’s Prologue she identified a goldfinch, blue and great tits and a jay. The boys at Eton get to see this magnificent thing at least once in their tenure at the school (though they are liable to think it has something to do with Hindenberg or Battenberg). It’s also on display during regularly scheduled open days, so find a teenager and bring him in tow. I flew on my way, after stroking the pages and posing for this photo, aware of how lucky I am to be allowed to touch these 560-year-old pages.

In my wanderings I’m fortunate to come in contact with many practitioners of the dark arts. (No, this is not a reference to Harry Potter, but the worldwide confraternity of ink-stained printers.) Recently I was invited to tour the extraordinary department of Graphic Communications at the California Polytechnic State University, better known as Cal Poly, in San Luis Obispo, California. The students who take printing and design production classes under department chair Ken Macro and associate professor Brian Lawler (the fellow pictured in these fuzzy photos) are lucky indeed. The department boasts the most astonishing array of printing technology under one roof that I have seen.

They don’t just have the largest graphic arts library in the world, but one of almost every kind of old and new printing machine, from the heaviest cast iron to the shiniest high tech. Mr Lawler’s tour of the facilities included glimpses of sturdy 20th century machines for foil stamping and die-cutting, a machine for making perfect bindings, a mammoth Heidelberg Speedmaster four-color press than can pump out 15,000 impressions per hour, the world’s fanciest and most expensive exacto knife (AKA an ESKO computer-driven cutter that costs more than most of us make in a year). Then there are the photopolymer plate makers, the rotogravure machine that is apparently only economical for runs of a million or more, and the amazing eight-color Flexo printing machine that employs those polymer plates. Every student learns how to run and maintain all of these state-of-the-art monsters, some of which are loaned (rather cleverly) by the manufacturers. This means that from time to time, the very latest model replaces the one on the floor–and the graduates of this program, whether designing packaging or digital user interfaces, or learning to operate and manage complex printing processes, easily find great jobs.

Amazed as I was by all this modernity, my heart really belonged to the basement floor, where 19 working letterpresses are housed in the “Shakespeare Press Museum.” It’s not a museum so much as a working shop, with 500 fonts of type and everything from an 1850 Washington Hand Press to several Little Pilots and a behemoth newspaper press (the Campbell Country Cylinder Press) once used to print the Soledad weekly. There’s even a working Linotype machine, that remarkable invention of Ottmar Mergenthaler inspired by the Jacquard looms that prefigured the punch cards of early modern computing. (All together now: Farewell Etaion Shrdlu!) And naturally, as befits all printing establishments, there is a framed facsimile of a leaf from the first major book ever printed, our own personal favorite, the Gutenberg (Schoeffer-Fust) Bible!

It’s always amazing to me to consider what was going on at the same time that Gutenberg was developing his system of moveable type and bringing in Fust and Schoeffer to help him fund and execute his big idea. Recently I was in Florence, and had the opportunity to visit the San Marco Monastery, which in addition to having the most dazzling paintings by Fra Angelico, also happens to have one of the world’s most beautiful libraries. It’s mostly a museum space now, displaying some of the incredible manuscript choir-books used by the monks. When you hear publishers nowadays talk about “big books” you might instead consider one like this.

It’s a “Gradual”, lettered in 1451-1452 by two of the monastery’s monks. 1451-1452–the very same year that, in Mainz, the Gutenberg workshop was beginning work on the monumental printed Vulgate Bible. I wanted to show you the size of it, along with the side view of the massive brass bosses that protected the cover in an original 15th century binding. The midpoint of the 15th century was a big year, it seems: it’s also the date the architect Michelozzo built the library itself for Cosimo de’ Medici, who had a cell of his own in the monastery upstairs. The artist-scribes for several of these large choir books were Zanobi Strozzi, a famous pupil of Fra Angelico, and Filippo di Matteo Torelli. Here’s an open page from a different book to show you how sumptuous and impressive they were inside, as well as out.

I remember with searing clarity the day I printed a thousand envelopes with the wrong zip code in Yolla Bolly red. It was my trial week in a fine letterpress shop in a remote California valley. The master printer bellowed, and I cried. I had hoped to become the Yolla Bolly Press’s first apprentice, but for a while it looked like I would be the last.

Jim Robertson was a hard-charging, passionate master of his craft who ruled his shop with an iron fist and an exacting eye. When after all he took me on, I spent the first weeks cutting paper and distributing type back in its case, terrified that I’d screw up. He was a damned “feinschmecker,” he conceded later with a grin. The term, a blend of fussbudget and connoisseur, reflects the fact that printing, to be truly fine, requires utmost precision. The secret to Yolla Bolly’s gorgeous books was obsessive attention to detail, from design to execution. Each page was carefully composed in shape and size; each line of type was justified, inked, and impressed exactly right.

Les Lloyd, my first master, was the complete opposite. My grandfather was a renowned San Francisco typographer who started teaching me the ‘dark art’ in my teens. An extraordinary man who designed books with Ansel Adams, the Grabhorn brothers, and other California luminaries, he was modest and self-effacing. He ran the largest hot type foundry on the West Coast,Mackenzie & Harris, and printed in his little hobby shop in his spare time. We printed together in his suburban garage; he didn’t rant when I wasted sheets or dumped a tray of type onto the floor, a mess called “printers’ pie”. He only laughed and told me to start over.

His method was gentle, patient: he printed for the love of it, to please himself. He passed to me the heritage that he himself received, leaving school at 16 to become a printer and lifelong member of the club of Printing House Craftsmen. I remember feeling deeply honored on the day that he saluted me in public as his apprentice.

I dedicated my first novel, the story of the Gutenberg Bible, to both these long-gone, much-loved masters. And over the many years of my different apprenticeships — in printing and in novel-writing, and in life — I’ve come to see the fundamental lesson they imparted. True mastery requires both kinds of training: perfectionism, if not sheer obsession, and abiding patience.

We live in a world of instaneity: our culture celebrates the teenaged millionaire, the overnight success. Yet all of our crafts, our wild, inventive human skill with tools, are based on something slower and much deeper. The path to skill in any art requires a long and painful journey. Despite our bits and bytes, this truth still holds. It took seven years in the medieval guilds: a period of apprenticeship, before the journeyman set out upon his wander years. This slow learning, to my mind, is like the movement called “slow food”. Its chief components are time and close instruction, which engage the mind and body in a way no massive open online course can do.

Every Friday for two years, my grandfather and I printed at his Red Squirrel Press. We made books and pamphlets and ephemera; he showed me secrets of the trade, from tissue paper packing tricks to letterspacing. We pored over books made by Leonard Baskin and Frederic Goudy; he described the Monotype caster, the Linotype, the San Francisco fine presses that descended from the English artisans at the great Kelmscott and Doves presses.

This was the first half of the gift of apprenticeship: preserving mankind’s store of knowledge, which the printing press had first made possible. Les was not just a mentor, standing in for the parent as the master did, “in loco parentis.” He was a living link transmitting our cultural heritage, embedded in brain and heart through the act of making at his side.

The second value of this kind of learning is the method the apprentice learns. In his marvelous treatise “The Craftsman,” the philosopher Richard Sennett defines craftsmanship as doing a job well for its own sake. There are no short cuts: “the craftsman must be patient, eschewing quick fixes.” The goal is to embed skill in the body, to make this knowledge tacit, so that the mind and hands are freed to play and push the tools beyond their given purpose. Aristotle noted the same thing centuries ago: “We are what we repeatedly do. Excellence, then, is not an act, but a habit.”

It’s fashionable now to talk of the 10,000 hours it takes to achieve mastery in a field. But what this misses is what happens in those hours. Rote repetition is a waste of time; the learning comes from failure, and then self-correction. The feeling is a sense of not-quite-there that every artist knows. A humbling occurs, a willingness to dwell in this discomfort. “The patience of a craftsman can thus be defined as the temporary suspension of the desire for closure, “ Sennett writes.

I think of Jim’s stubborn feinschmeckery, the high standard he set for the printed word, which he called “the playing field of the human imagination.” I think of Les’s gnarled fingers setting half of Moby Dick in his retirement, his speed and expertise amazing the next generation. I see now how their gifts of patience and precision have informed my own apprenticeship in the allied craft of writing, which has taken me far longer than the seven years prescribed by any guild.

In craft, we are absorbed; we enter the material, lose the murky overlay of ego. Monastic scribes believed that this rapt state made of their bodies a pure channel for God’s word. In modern terms, what I’ve been taught — through trial and error, failure and rejection and success — is that the craft of making has its own time, and that excellence cannot be rushed or forced.

When Jim died, too young, I spoke at his memorial. The Robertsons built books from the inside out, I said — starting with the words, the human spirit they conveyed. Decades before I knew anything about Gutenberg, I eulogized “that great handing-on, bringing a new generation forward steeped in the craft, lore and love of the letterpress.”

As Les lay dying, I worked against the clock to finish our last book, his memoir of the heyday of hot type. He waited as I printed the title page on his old platen press, and had a sample volume bound. I placed it in his hands; he whispered thanks. The torch was passed. The next day he was gone.

The birthday in 1801 of Karl Baedeker just passed, and the literary website LitHub noted the occasion by publishing a photo of the foldout maps that were seen as an innovation when Baedeker’s celebrated guidebooks first appeared. I chuckled, since last week I enjoyed the enormous privilege of visiting the rare book collection at Harvard’s Houghton Library, where I carefully unfolded the world’s actual first printed foldout maps. In the 1480s, a canon of the Mainz cathedral chapter, Bernard Breydenbach, set out on a pilgrimage to the Holy Land, and Erhart Reuwich illustrated and printed his account, replete with fabulous foldout maps. Five hundred years later they are a bit scuffed and torn, but still open to three or four times the width of the book–pieced together, a true feat of early pressmanship and binding. The images themselves, cut in wood (above left, Rome) are incredibly gorgeous.

I had never laid eyes–or fingers–on many of the greatest works of early printing which I researched as I was learning about the life of Peter Schoeffer. So with the kind assistance of John Overholt, a curator at the Houghton, I spent a blissful Cambridge afternoon immersed in the smell and touch of 500-year-old paper and vellum. I marveled at the beauty of Nicholas Jenson’s red printer’s mark, reproduced below, on an edition of Duns Scotus; at the pounding impression used by Ulrich Zell in Cologne just a few decades after the invention by Gutenberg and crew; and at the exquisite workmanship of Regiomontanus’s 1482 calendar printed by Erhard Ratdolt in Venice, with its amazing waxing and waning moons. Perhaps the most special, though, was a single leaf from the 36-line Bible, which Gutenberg is believed to have had printed by Heinrich Keffer for the Bishop of Bamberg after the 42-line “Gutenberg” bible. I got a little dizzy, too, turning the four pages that Harvard owns of the 1462 Vulgate Bible printed by Schoeffer and Fust — these were the actual pages they set and printed.

Book people have as much to love in the Boston area as we do in London. I was especially impressed by the Boston Athenaeum, where I gave a talk on the making of the Gutenberg Bible. Atop Beacon Hill, it’s a gorgeous building filled with gorgeous books, a membership temple to the book much like my beloved London Library. Curator Stanley Cushing trotted me through it, stopping with understandable pride at George Washington’s own set of the first American encyclopedia. Truly, books are more than containers for texts. Libraries are the temples where our world is preserved. Volume by volume, the printers of the past encoded the cultural DNA of our species.

 

 

 

*My piece from the New Statesman, reprinted here in case you missed it!

Among the reams that have been written about Johann Gutenberg, there is one little known and telling piece. The inventor of printing, it seems, could be a brute. While experimenting in the 1430s in Alsace, he was sued by a lady with whom he’d dallied, but refused to marry. Yet her claim for breach of marriage contract wasn’t half of it. When the matter came to court, the German entrepreneur attacked the woman’s witness with such vulgar threats that he was fined for his foul mouth.

Gutenberg was undoubtedly a genius, but he could also be a lout. He left a trail of lawsuits and disgruntled partners behind him throughout his career, while at the same time dreaming up the most important human innovation since the wheel.

Researching his life for my first novel, I couldn’t help but notice how his behavior echoed that of the titans of our own technology revolution — and, for that matter, megalomaniacal creators through the ages. Many great innovators, from Steve Jobs to Larry Ellison, Pablo Picasso to Wolfgang Mozart, exhibit a similar profile: extraordinary creativity coupled with callous, often imperious, disregard for others. Silicon Valley is stuffed with such “brilliant bastards,” reported Wired magazine in 2012.

At a time when all of us, in every walk of life, are exhorted to show “innovative thinking,” it is worth asking what such profiles tell us. Must we be cruel to create? How far should we accept the idea that great minds are not all that social? The experience of the world’s first tech entrepreneur may help to shed some light.

Printing with moveable type was a fraught undertaking that took Gutenberg ten, if not 15, years to get to actually work. Borrowing money left and right, he turned to letters only after the failure of another venture, making metal mirrors for medieval pilgrims. Even then, he and his team — his venture capitalist, the merchant Johann Fust, and his apprentice, the former scribe Peter Schoeffer — had to overcome political, financial and technical obstacles galore. Perseverance was a key prerequisite: to hang on through that long, bumpy ride, he had to have thick skin.

Such disdain for the opinions of the herd may in fact help to ring-fence original thinking. As every artist and writer knows, thick skin is essential to weather the contempt of contemporaries while engaged in the process of forging something new. Social interaction is also antithetical to solitude; to get into the creative flow, the world must be shut out. (It bears noting that Gutenberg never married or had children.)

Recent studies show that brilliant people’s brains are more sensitive to stimuli, and less able to filter them out; their emotional lives are more volatile. Antisocial behavior can be useful in keeping the world at bay, creating space for leaps of cognitive insight.

Nowadays, we’ve even hit on a new diagnosis of the abrasive, brilliant individual — they’re neurologically different from the norm. Extreme focus and social awkwardness are common in mild forms of autism such as Asperger’s Syndrome. A 2012 study, meanwhile, revealed “exceptionally high” rates of autism among high-tech workers in the Netherlands, a finding the authors extended to tech clusters like Silicon Valley.

A more recent study suggested that geeks produce more autistic offspring, though some argue that the spike may simply be due to later childbearing or higher education generally. Temple Grandin, the autistic animal scientist, remarked that Albert Einstein would be considered autistic today.

Peter Thiel, a venture capitalist who co-founded PayPal, asserts that people with “Asperger’s-like social ineptitude” have the ideal psychological profile for creative innovation. “If you’re less sensitive to social cues, then you’re not likely to do the same thing as everyone else around you,” he and a co-author wrote in the 2014 book “Zero to One.”

Working with such people, of course, can be a nightmare, as many who knew Jobs report, and as Gutenberg’s example suggests. Yet at the same time they can inspire. Two recent biographies of Jobs reveal this dichotemy, which my novel of Gutenberg also explores. We put up with the brutal, egomaniacal boss because the work is so important and exciting. Paradoxically, they push us beyond our limits, provoking us to accomplish things we never imagined we could do.

Still, a domineering, belittling demeanor will only take you so far. We still cling to the Romantic view of the lone genius. But in technology, more than in literature or art, eventually you need a team to execute your idea. By the second coming of Steve Jobs — when in 1996 he resumed the lead at Apple after being booted out ten years before — he had at last learned to play more nicely with others.

Gutenberg, alas, apparently had not. Here is the other side of the story of his famous Bible: although the splendid book was made, the partnership was poisoned by bad blood between the genius and his banker. It blew up spectacularly in yet another court of law, and Gutenberg, for all his brilliance, was left to watch the others profit.

One of the greatest pleasures of publishing a novel is the news that trickles in from foreign parts. Every now and again I get an unexpected note from a reader, and these make my day. People write in just to say how much they enjoyed “Gutenberg’s Apprentice”, often tossing in a comment about their connection to printing or simply their appreciation of what it took to bring books into the world. One bookseller at Coles Books in Edmonton, Alberta, wrote to say that she had made the book a “staff pick,” and hoped to make it a “CEO 100”, meaning she’d try to sell 100 copies in three months. “I think it’s a very important book in that it covers an important development in the availability of the written word as well as in the nature of what was later written, ” wrote Connie Flanagan. Thank you, Connie. Another wrote in to say she was a “huge fan,” and requested a signed photo (oh my!)

Then there are the foreign editions, which my wonderful agents have sold all over the world. I delight in seeing each one, which interpret my story in ways appropriate to their own readers. The covers are all different, and magical to me. I was especially amazed to see the reception of my novel in Taiwan, where the Mandarin edition has just appeared. At the 24-hour Eslite Bookstore in Taipei, it was chosen the “Best Book of July” and got a marvelous in-store display. Just as exciting to me was the fabulous production: a beautiful Japanese-bound book in its own slipcase, along with a commemorative envelope of three keepsake postcards. A photo appears here; other editions are shown below.

I adore the Spanish version of the title: El Discípulo de Gutenberg – the word “disciple” is so absolutely perfect a description of Peter Schoeffer’s role, and apt as a synonym for “apprentice”, it seems to me. Take a look at the Polish edition and the Hungarian, too. Each is beautiful, evocative, taking its inspiration from the hand illuminations that accompanied the world’s first printed book. More editions will be coming, in Croatian, Portugese, and other languages. I can’t wait to see what they will look like.

 

I attended a fascinating conference at the British Library last week about the worrisome rise in thefts of rare books from libraries in Europe. The rare books that survive from the past on paper and vellum are much more than commodities worth millions to be traded at auction, librarians reminded us. The National Library of Sweden was pillaged for a decade by its own head of manuscripts; one of its librarians said that ancient and rare books in national collections are nothing less than the cultural memory of an entire people. Stealing and reselling these to the antiquarian book trade is like “causing brain damage in the national memory,” he said.

Luckily there are many ethical bibliophiles out there who would not want to possess a treasure that has been stolen from its rightful owner.

My full report on the proceedings is at the Prospero culture blog at Economist.com